Created by: | Orig. Posting Date | User Name | Edit Date |
| Jan 26, 2020 08:07AM | Tagus | |
| Jan 25, 2020 10:34AM | dklawson | |
| Jan 24, 2020 02:34PM | malsal | |
| Jan 24, 2020 09:32AM | croc7 | Edited: Jan 24, 2020 09:33AM |
| Jan 24, 2020 08:30AM | Tagus |
Posted:
Jan 26, 2020
08:07AM
|
Total posts: 438
Last post: Nov 13, 2022 Member since:Mar 27, 2002
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 15 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
Thanks all. I'm staying with the 0.75's.
|
|
Total posts: 9241
Last post: Aug 17, 2023 Member since:Jun 5, 2000
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
+1 to Malsal's comments.
Doug L.
|
|
Total posts: 8382
Last post: Jan 13, 2022 Member since:Feb 7, 2006
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
I don't know the answer but I do know Mini's need all the fluid they can to make them work and going down from a 0.75 to a 0.70 would not seem to help things imo.
If in doubt, flat out. Colin Mc Rae MBE 1968-2007.
Give a car more power and it goes faster on the straights,
make a car lighter and it's faster everywhere. Colin Chapman.
Edited:
Jan 24, 2020
09:33AM
|
|
Total posts: 834
Last post: Mar 7, 2023 Member since:Aug 15, 2002
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
Not sure about the bore diameter question but I believe the MG1100 MC has a slightly longer push rod to compensate for a thicker firewall.
|
|
Total posts: 438
Last post: Nov 13, 2022 Member since:Mar 27, 2002
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 15 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
I have a clutch Master Cylinder with a 0.70 bore in good condition. Seems Mini's used 0.75 whereas 1100's used 0.70. Would there be an issue with using this 1100 MC in a Mini? Has anyone done this with good success? I can see the 1100 being a larger car probably had more stroke on it's clutch pedal which would translate to the same fluid capacity as the Mini's.
