× 1-800-946-2642 Home My Account Social / Forum Articles Contact My Cart
Shop Now
Select Your Car Type Sale Items Clearance Items New Items
   Forum Width:     Forum Type: 

Found 29 Messages

Previous Set of Pages 1 | 2

 Posted: May 3, 2012 06:02PM
Total posts: 173
Last post: Sep 29, 2013
Member since:Oct 5, 2010
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0

I really like the concept, but I have a couple of suggestions:

 

I think you could reduce the scale of it a bit. Maybe remove the front and rear curved parts? Also, possibly a smaller diameter of tube steel. And only 4, not 6 attachments. I really like the quality of the attachments, but even those could be smaller with only one bolt apiece. Far better than the suction cup and strap ones.

 

If it were a bit more diminutive and used a little less material you might be able to bring the cost down, and I don't think you'd sacrifice much of the robustness. You can only really put so much weight on the roof of a mini anyway. I have no interest in the light mounts, but I frequently find myself wishing I had a roof rack (especially when my wife takes my truck

 

Pete

 

Refitting is the reverse sequence to removal. 

 Posted: May 3, 2012 03:57PM
Total posts: 7051
Last post: Apr 26, 2024
Member since:May 23, 2002
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0

Sounds like you already have 16 potential buyers...gotta love Facebook!

"Retired:  No Job, No Money, Wife and I!  Will travel anywhere for Minis"

[email protected]

 Posted: May 3, 2012 02:50PM
Total posts: 1572
Last post: Feb 26, 2021
Member since:Jan 14, 1999
Cars in Garage: 15
Photos: 1688
WorkBench Posts: 35
DonRacine
US

Close up of attachment- we would suggest adding a little piece of rubber (inner tube?) to isolate the metal from the gutter.

 Posted: May 3, 2012 02:10PM
jeg
Total posts: 7075
Last post: Nov 5, 2019
Member since:Apr 25, 2000
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0

I rather like it.

The peasants are revolting...          

"Gone with the Wind" - a brief yet moving vignette concerning lactose intolerance

 Posted: May 3, 2012 02:03PM
Total posts: 1572
Last post: Feb 26, 2021
Member since:Jan 14, 1999
Cars in Garage: 15
Photos: 1688
WorkBench Posts: 35
DonRacine
US

Interesting- just posted this picture on our Facebook and have 16 people like it!

//www.facebook.com/MiniMania

 Posted: May 3, 2012 01:56PM
Total posts: 1787
Last post: Mar 26, 2024
Member since:Feb 1, 2000
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
I'd describe it as "stout". Kinda like it. I'm not sure about the light in the rear though. The potential price is another matter.

 Posted: May 3, 2012 01:45PM
Total posts: 1572
Last post: Feb 26, 2021
Member since:Jan 14, 1999
Cars in Garage: 15
Photos: 1688
WorkBench Posts: 35
DonRacine
US

"Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder"  (Note- this picture was taken on my Riley that I have also been told is Ugly?)

 

This saying first appeared in the 3rd century BC in Greek. It didn't appear in its current form in print until the 19th century, but in the meantime there were various written forms that expressed much the same thought. In 1588, the English dramatist John Lyly, in his Euphues and his England, wrote:

"...as neere is Fancie to Beautie, as the pricke to the Rose, as the stalke to the rynde, as the earth to the roote."

Shakespeare expressed a similar sentiment in Love's Labours Lost, 1588:

Good Lord Boyet, my beauty, though but mean,
Needs not the painted flourish of your praise:
Beauty is bought by judgement of the eye,
Not utter'd by base sale of chapmen's tongues

Benjamin Franklin, in Poor Richard's Almanack, 1741, wrote:

Beauty, like supreme dominion
Is but supported by opinion

David Hume's Essays, Moral and Political, 1742, include:

"Beauty in things exists merely in the mind which contemplates them."

beauty is in the eye of the beholderThe person who is widely credited with coining the saying in its current form is Margaret Wolfe Hungerford (née Hamilton), who wrote many books, often under the pseudonym of 'The Duchess'. In Molly Bawn, 1878, there's the line "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder", which is the earliest citation of it that I can find in print.

 Posted: May 3, 2012 01:38PM
Total posts: 7051
Last post: Apr 26, 2024
Member since:May 23, 2002
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0

Sorry Don, but that is just plain UGLY!

"Retired:  No Job, No Money, Wife and I!  Will travel anywhere for Minis"

[email protected]

 Posted: May 3, 2012 11:51AM
Total posts: 1572
Last post: Feb 26, 2021
Member since:Jan 14, 1999
Cars in Garage: 15
Photos: 1688
WorkBench Posts: 35
DonRacine
US

How may people would be interested in thei very heavy duty (although is only weights 35lbs.) Cost will not be cheap, probably $699 in steel and $799 in alloy (15lbs in weight). PS- Lights not included.

RoofRack2

Found 29 Messages

Previous Set of Pages 1 | 2