Fuel Level Sending Unit: Resistance?
Created by: Rosebud
Orig. Posting Date | User Name | Edit Date |
Mar 10, 2019 09:07PM | Rosebud | |
Mar 10, 2019 09:04PM | Rosebud | |
Mar 8, 2019 04:35AM | RedRiley | |
Mar 6, 2019 05:06PM | dklawson | |
Mar 6, 2019 02:06PM | Rosebud | Edited: Mar 6, 2019 03:54PM |
Mar 1, 2019 07:09AM | dklawson | |
Mar 1, 2019 04:56AM | RedRiley | Edited: Mar 6, 2019 03:05PM |
Mar 1, 2019 04:48AM | RedRiley | Edited: Mar 3, 2019 07:15AM |
Feb 28, 2019 09:39PM | Rosebud | Edited: Feb 28, 2019 11:21PM |
Total posts: 1368
Last post: Jul 20, 2023 Member since:Jul 15, 2008
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 117 WorkBench Posts: 1 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dklawson
BTW, I really liked your article in Moss Motoring.
Total posts: 1368
Last post: Jul 20, 2023 Member since:Jul 15, 2008
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 117 WorkBench Posts: 1 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedRiley
Michael,
I was wondering how you are venting? I put a 15 gallon tank in Kreacher, and ran the vent hose down and out like the original setup, but I'm getting a lot of gas odors from the vent when the car sits in the garage. I did some reading and mostly saw recommendations that the top of the vent tube should be higher than the top of the tank. I should probably have a rollover valve too.
I was wondering how you are venting? I put a 15 gallon tank in Kreacher, and ran the vent hose down and out like the original setup, but I'm getting a lot of gas odors from the vent when the car sits in the garage. I did some reading and mostly saw recommendations that the top of the vent tube should be higher than the top of the tank. I should probably have a rollover valve too.
Total posts: 2100
Last post: Oct 22, 2023 Member since:May 1, 2007
|
Cars in Garage: 1
Photos: 220 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
Michael,
I'm going to piggy back on your post since you mentioned the fuel cell. I was wondering how you are venting? I put a 15 gallon tank in Kreacher, and ran the vent hose down and out like the original setup, but I'm getting a lot of gas odors from the vent when the car sits in the garage. I did some reading and mostly saw recommendations that the top of the vent tube should be higher than the top of the tank. I should probably have a rollover valve too. I'm working on a solution, and I know my setup is probably different than yours with the VTEC and fuel injection. Just wondered if you had any suggestions.
I'm going to piggy back on your post since you mentioned the fuel cell. I was wondering how you are venting? I put a 15 gallon tank in Kreacher, and ran the vent hose down and out like the original setup, but I'm getting a lot of gas odors from the vent when the car sits in the garage. I did some reading and mostly saw recommendations that the top of the vent tube should be higher than the top of the tank. I should probably have a rollover valve too. I'm working on a solution, and I know my setup is probably different than yours with the VTEC and fuel injection. Just wondered if you had any suggestions.
Total posts: 9241
Last post: Aug 17, 2023 Member since:Jun 5, 2000
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
Let us know how you resolve this.
BTW, I really liked your article in Moss Motoring. You captured how I always felt driving either Spitfires or Midgets.
BTW, I really liked your article in Moss Motoring. You captured how I always felt driving either Spitfires or Midgets.
Doug L.
Total posts: 1368
Last post: Jul 20, 2023 Member since:Jul 15, 2008
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 117 WorkBench Posts: 1 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dklawson
Which of those parts do you currently have in your car? Is the fuel cell currently in use? Is the magnolia face speedo and fuel gauge currently in use?
Total posts: 9241
Last post: Aug 17, 2023 Member since:Jun 5, 2000
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
I was unable to load Brian's links directly. If you have trouble, cut and paste the links into your browser's address bar and delete the "//" at their front so they start with "WWW".
You said your gauge is reading backwards then you included pictures of a speedometer and an aftermarket sending unit. Which of those parts do you currently have in your car? Is the fuel cell currently in use? Is the magnolia face speedo and fuel gauge currently in use?
Succinctly if you have the WIDE needle fuel gauge that does NOT respond quickly (most Minis from 1965 on) then it was designed to work with a sending unit with a NOMINAL resistance range of about 270 Ohms = Empty to 30 Ohms = Full.
As Brian said, the 240 empty to 33 full Ohm aftermarket sender should work for you. Without touching the gauge, the 240-33 sender will work great when full. However, the tank will become empty before the gauge indicates empty. You will either need to identify on the gauge face where you need to fill up OR you will need to tweak the gauge calibration to match the sender.
That said, you have one more option. Visit the Spiyda Design website (link below) and buy their Gauge Wizard board. It will allow you match virtually any sending unit to your gauge. The guy who runs the site and developed the boards is a Mini owner so he is aware of what is involved with our cars.
www.spiyda.com
You said your gauge is reading backwards then you included pictures of a speedometer and an aftermarket sending unit. Which of those parts do you currently have in your car? Is the fuel cell currently in use? Is the magnolia face speedo and fuel gauge currently in use?
Succinctly if you have the WIDE needle fuel gauge that does NOT respond quickly (most Minis from 1965 on) then it was designed to work with a sending unit with a NOMINAL resistance range of about 270 Ohms = Empty to 30 Ohms = Full.
As Brian said, the 240 empty to 33 full Ohm aftermarket sender should work for you. Without touching the gauge, the 240-33 sender will work great when full. However, the tank will become empty before the gauge indicates empty. You will either need to identify on the gauge face where you need to fill up OR you will need to tweak the gauge calibration to match the sender.
That said, you have one more option. Visit the Spiyda Design website (link below) and buy their Gauge Wizard board. It will allow you match virtually any sending unit to your gauge. The guy who runs the site and developed the boards is a Mini owner so he is aware of what is involved with our cars.
www.spiyda.com
Doug L.
Total posts: 2100
Last post: Oct 22, 2023 Member since:May 1, 2007
|
Cars in Garage: 1
Photos: 220 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
This one in the 240-33 ohms range should do the trick.
//www.tanksinc.com/index.cfm/page/ptype=product/product_id=346/category_id=184/mode=prod/prd346.htm
//www.tanksinc.com/index.cfm/page/ptype=product/product_id=346/category_id=184/mode=prod/prd346.htm
Total posts: 2100
Last post: Oct 22, 2023 Member since:May 1, 2007
|
Cars in Garage: 1
Photos: 220 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
Total posts: 1368
Last post: Jul 20, 2023 Member since:Jul 15, 2008
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 117 WorkBench Posts: 1 |
|
Does anyone here have a good understanding of fuel level sending units? My sending unit, along with my Smiths gauge has always read backwards. When the tank is full, the gauge reads E. When the tank's empty, the gauge reads F. It's not a big deal really, I tell friends it's a British thing, E stands for "Entirely full," F is for "Fuel needed." I thought perhaps it was simply a polarity issue. After reversing the positive (+) and negative (-) leads, I realized it was a bit more complicated. I now understand sending units use resistance to send their signal to the gauge.
I was fine with the backward reading gauge, but lately the gauge has become wonky and unreliable. So, I'm going to replace the sending unit and might as well get one that reads correctly. The problem is I don't know whether I need one that uses high resistance to signal a full tank, or low resistance to indicate full. Is there anyone here that would know?
To complicate matters, I have a fuel cell with a neoprene bladder that requires a sending unit with an enclosed float (see pic). I'm sure that will limit my choices. But, let's start with the resistance issue first. Thanks!
I was fine with the backward reading gauge, but lately the gauge has become wonky and unreliable. So, I'm going to replace the sending unit and might as well get one that reads correctly. The problem is I don't know whether I need one that uses high resistance to signal a full tank, or low resistance to indicate full. Is there anyone here that would know?
To complicate matters, I have a fuel cell with a neoprene bladder that requires a sending unit with an enclosed float (see pic). I'm sure that will limit my choices. But, let's start with the resistance issue first. Thanks!