Orig. Posting Date | User Name | Edit Date |
Sep 20, 2022 05:52AM | Blue Meanie | |
Sep 20, 2022 01:24AM | Alex | |
Sep 19, 2022 08:45AM | Blue Meanie | |
Sep 19, 2022 03:00AM | TK | |
Sep 17, 2022 10:25AM | theminimark | |
Sep 17, 2022 07:25AM | Blue Meanie |
Total posts: 128
Last post: Sep 20, 2022 Member since:Sep 6, 1999
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
Notches
Notched
Chamfering
Surface Machined
Are the Piper 255 and SW5 cams similar? I've seen recommendations for both of them
Thanks!
if everything seems under control,. then you're not going fast enough
Total posts: 10189
Last post: Sep 13, 2023 Member since:Mar 24, 1999
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
Yes - it's a great idea.
The 1098 is my engine of choice, even over a 1275.
Go to +.060" on a straight rebore to ensure good bores, 12G295 head or a 202 if you can't find one, balance the crank (important), Piper 255 cam, compression ratio around 9-9.5:1, and it will pull trees over.
Don't rev it enormously (going much over 6000 isn't a great idea), but the wall of torque makes it unnecessary anyway.
Total posts: 128
Last post: Sep 20, 2022 Member since:Sep 6, 1999
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
The crank shaft looks to be modified with some surface material removed and other tell tale signs
It would definitely need to be checked for cracks or other defects. Both main and con rod journals show 0.020 on the bearings as well.
CalverST sells some pistons developed by Russell Engineering for the 1098 - I'm guessing this is the way to go
Along with an SW5 cam and the original A+ 998 gearbox and FD, I should be all set
if everything seems under control,. then you're not going fast enough
Total posts: 1113
Last post: Aug 5, 2023 Member since:May 13, 2002
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
PS. The 'Graham' that the previous poster is referring to is Graham Russell. Some call him God, others don't.
Total posts: 663
Last post: Aug 27, 2023 Member since:Aug 6, 2002
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
p.s. if you'd like another head to work with, I have a 12G202 1100 head that might help. let me know
Total posts: 128
Last post: Sep 20, 2022 Member since:Sep 6, 1999
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
The 998 A+ currently installed is damaged because of a suspected broken ring
I found a bare 1098 block which looks to be in great shape and another 1098 that is assembled but siezed due to weathering without the head installed.
should I pursue the idea of using all three engines and building a good running 1098 using parts from all three units?
I’d like some opinions and ideas before making any decisions
thanks
if everything seems under control,. then you're not going fast enough