Orig. Posting Date | User Name | Edit Date |
Apr 13, 2012 04:57AM | CooperTune | |
Apr 11, 2012 01:24AM | DRMINI | |
Apr 10, 2012 11:21AM | CooperTune | |
Apr 10, 2012 09:29AM | Hunter2 | |
Apr 10, 2012 08:45AM | roll | |
Oct 2, 2011 09:47PM | S. Alexander | Edited: Oct 2, 2011 10:21PM |
Oct 1, 2011 08:01AM | yan6 |
Total posts: 4141
Last post: Jul 28, 2024 Member since:Oct 8, 2011
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
Kevin, you got me thinking about the weak link in the front suspension. If you think about it the tie rod (lower strut) is held to the lower control arm by a 5/16 bolt. The lower control are is held in place by a 3/8 stud on the wiggle pin. I once as a young guy was able to rip the strut rod tab off the corner of the sub frame. I was using rose jointed bits and the 5/16 bolt that ties the body to the front corner of sub frame was all that saved me from a really bad ride. I have installed both the MSC adjustables and the much beefer one with the 1 inch threaded ends. It is nice to back off a jamb nut and adjust camber without jacking the car. Then all you need to do is roll a little to relieve camber thrust.
CTR
Total posts: 8645
Last post: Dec 16, 2020 Member since:Oct 27, 2000
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
I fitted fixed -1.5° arms because IMO the current Minispares design ones with a 1/2" thread hanging out the end looked too flimsy (after I had bought a pair). I had visions of them being taken out by a standard Oz design pothole.
Maybe it's just me, but I reckon the old tube and locknut style ones looked more solid.
Kevin G
1360 power- Morris 1300 auto block, S crank & rods, Russell Engineering RE282 sprint cam, over 125HP at crank, 86.6HP at the wheels @7000+.
Total posts: 4141
Last post: Jul 28, 2024 Member since:Oct 8, 2011
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
I'd agree with on car adjustable lower arms. 1.5 arms are just 1.5 different from what you had. As you raise and lower the ride height the camber will change also.
CTR
Total posts: 6469
Last post: Sep 29, 2022 Member since:Nov 2, 2006
|
Cars in Garage: 4
Photos: 1354 WorkBench Posts: 2 |
![]() |
Go adjustable arms as a Mini may have come from the factory with anything from 1 to 2.5 degrees positive camber. Adjustable arms end all issues and allow for fine tuning of camber after height and caster changes. My 2 cents.
Total posts: 17
Last post: Jun 16, 2012 Member since:Sep 11, 2003
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
this question has been in the back of my mind for month if not years,
and yet with the mathematical knowledge floating in the back of my mind the two have never been able to merge together.
I could kick myself in the rear for it
thanks Steve
It's Not The Size, It's How You Use It.
Total posts: 985
Last post: Jul 2, 2019 Member since:Aug 5, 2000
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 2 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
Been awhile since I made up a pair of non adsjustable 1.5 degree arms, but if I recall, I added 1/8" to the stock length; 2 degrees would be 33% more than that, etc. The formula is: Tangent of the angle equals side (a) over side (b). The angle being the camber increase you want; side (a) being the arm length increase you are looking for; and side (b) being the the distance between swivel joint ball centers, which you can get close enough to, using a ruller; (if you are off a quarter inch in your measurment, it is not that critical). I don't have one handy to measure, but I think it is between 4 and 5 inches. When you solve for side (a), just add it to the stock lower arm length.
Retired manufacturer of VTEC/Mini performance conversion kits
Total posts:
Last post: Sep 26, 2015 Member since:Aug 25, 1999
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
![]() |
can anyone chime in with the lengths for the lower arm for 1.5, 2 & 2.5 degree negative camber. I know its been posted before but I cant seem to find it.