× 1-800-946-2642 Home My Account Social / Forum Articles Contact My Cart
Shop Now
Select Your Car Type Sale Items Clearance Items New Items
   Forum Width:     Forum Type: 

 Posted: Dec 24, 2018 07:07AM
Total posts: 9241
Last post: Aug 17, 2023
Member since:Jun 5, 2000
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
It sounds like you have a workable solution.  Sorry the new plate was out of spec.

Doug L.
 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 04:25PM
Total posts: 125
Last post: Mar 6, 2023
Member since:Nov 18, 1999
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
Tried an old thicker tri. Plate and was able to get .0045 clearance.

 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 03:14PM
Total posts: 9241
Last post: Aug 17, 2023
Member since:Jun 5, 2000
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
If the old plates you have are so thick that they keep the sprocket from seating on the cam... the cam and triangle plate will be jammed together and you won't be able to turn the cam. 

Perhaps the new plate you have is under spec thickness and the old ones are closer to "right".  I would certainly check all of them.

Doug L.
 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 12:11PM
Total posts: 125
Last post: Mar 6, 2023
Member since:Nov 18, 1999
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
Diassembled everything again. Removed triangle plate and reinstalled sprocket and the sprocket slides all the way up against the cam face. Reinstalled the triangle plate and sprocket torqued up the nut to 65 ft. Lbs. still getting .019” . Previously I had hand fitted the sprocket in the triangle plate and you can see the sprocket face sitting about .005 +/- proud of the back of the tri. Plate. This would seem to make sense and would suggest that once installed and torqued up should work giving the proper clearance. I agree that I am probably missing something simple. I have some othe tri. Plates but they are thicker and may not allow the sprocket to contact the cam face. I am going to remove everything again take some more measurements and make sure everything fits together than maybe try the other tri. plates as I don’t have anything else to try at this point.

 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 04:04AM
Total posts: 9241
Last post: Aug 17, 2023
Member since:Jun 5, 2000
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
As above... look for possible problems with the components or assembly before looking for shims.

You said you read old threads on the subject.  Therefore, is it correct to assume you have all the parts assembled with everything torqued up (engine front plate, triangular cam plate, pulley fully seated against the cam shoulder, pulley nut tightened)?  Everything has to be installed and tightened properly before making endfloat measurements.

Doug L.
 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 02:29AM
Total posts: 10237
Last post: Apr 9, 2024
Member since:Mar 24, 1999
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
GB

I'd suggest something alse is awry as that is a massive amount !

Check the timing gear is locating correctly, I've had one which was machined wrong.

 Posted: Dec 22, 2018 07:00PM
Total posts: 125
Last post: Mar 6, 2023
Member since:Nov 18, 1999
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0
WorkBench Posts: 0
US
Just installed new cam and proceeded to measure end float with new triangle plate and nut torqued up to spec. Measured .019”. Should be .003”-.007”. Read all the postings but no info on where to get shims. Any suggestions?